Bacon’s Essays – Of Unity in Religion

Francis Bacon’s essay Of Unity in Religion emphasises the importance of unity in faith. He begins by explaining that unity strengthens both religion and society. In contrast, division weakens them. To make this clear, Bacon compares Christianity with pagan religions. He points out that pagan religions focused more on rituals and ceremonies than on meaningful beliefs. He observes that in pagan religions, the main leaders and teachers were poets, not theologians or spiritual guides. This shows that pagan faith lacked seriousness. It was more about performance and tradition than about seeking truths about life and the universe. Imagine a religion where people follow rituals simply because they are beautiful or traditional. Such practices, Bacon suggests, cannot build strong bonds among believers.

In contrast, Christianity is described as centred on the “true God.” This God is seen as “jealous,” meaning He does not allow any rivals or mixtures in worship. Worshipping false gods leads to moral decay, suffering, and estrangement from God’s life-giving presence. God’s jealousy is protective, seeking to guard His people from the destructive consequences of worshiping false gods and unfaithfulness. According to Bacon, this demand for complete devotion creates a strong sense of unity among Christians. Unity in worship and belief helps the community remain focused on shared values and goals.

Interestingly, the essay notes that quarrels about religion were rare among pagans, a consequence of their shallow belief systems. Profound faith, such as that found in Christianity, inherently invites interpretation, which can lead to disagreements. These disputes, though reflective of deep conviction, are considered dangerous by Bacon, as they threaten to fracture the unity essential to the Church’s strength.

The essay’s opening argument establishes a critical premise: unity in religion is crucial for its vitality and influence. Without it, religion risks deteriorate into mere tradition, losing its capacity to inspire and guide. The comparison with pagan religions highlights the distinction between superficial rituals and the deeper connection promoted by shared beliefs and mutual support. Such unity, the essay asserts, is the essence of a faith capable of withstanding the tests of time and division.

Highlighting the significance of unity in religion, Bacon states that it has benefits for both people outside the Church and those within it. Divisions within religious communities, he asserts, often have a detrimental effect on those who are not part of the Church. Observing believers involved in disputes and disagreements over religious matters can leave a poor impression. These divisions are described as “scandals,” a term denoting actions that provoke shock and disillusionment. The essay contends that such divisions are more damaging than instances of immoral behaviour, as they diminish respect for the Church and its teachings.

To explain this point, he employs a metaphor comparing division to a physical wound. In the human body, a wound or laceration is seen as more severe than an illness involving an imbalance in bodily fluids like a fever. Similarly, in the “spiritual body” of the Church, he argues that disunity (the wound) is far more harmful than individual failings (the fever). This analogy highlights the idea that divisions weaken the Church’s integrity, making it less appealing to those outside it: “Nothing keeps people out of the Church, or drives them out, more than a breach of unity.” This suggests that witnessing internal strife among believers discourage individuals from joining or remaining within the Church (Religion). Additionally, Bacon highlights how such disagreements empower atheists and critics of religion, giving them further grounds to reject or mock the Church. These fault-finders, described as “scorners,” are more inclined to ridicule the Church when its members are divided.

For members of the Church, unity serves as a source of deeply-felt peace. This peace is described not merely as the absence of conflict but as a harmonious state conducive to spiritual growth. When believers are united, their faith is fortified, and they are better positioned to embody “charity,” or love and kindness, towards one another. Furthermore, unity leads to a calm conscience that enables believers to feel a deeper sense of ease and connection with God. Bacon contrasts this harmonious unity with the disharmony brought about by frequent disputes. He suggests that energy spent on internal arguments could be redirected towards more spiritually enriching pursuits. Bacon says, “It shifts the focus from writing and reading contentious works to treatises on mortification (self-discipline) and devotion.” This indicates that unity allows believers to concentrate on self-improvement and deepening their relationship with God, rather than being consumed by disagreements.

Thus, Bacon emphasises the practical and spiritual significance of unity. For those outside the Church, unity projects an image of love, truth, and reliability, making the Church more welcoming. For those within, it creates an environment of peace and mutual support, enabling members to grow in faith and focus on their spiritual journey.

However, the concept of unity in religion, Bacon adds, necessitates careful boundary-setting to preserve both harmony and integrity. While unity is crucial, believers must neither succumb to excessive zeal nor to lukewarm compromise. There may be religious people inclined towards either of the two extremes that threaten religious cohesion and they should strive to avoid falling into any of them:

1. Excessive Zeal

Some people prioritise unwavering loyalty to specific religious groups or doctrines at the cost of peace. Such individuals often perceive harmony as a threat to their beliefs. A striking example is the biblical figure Jehu, who dismisses the notion of peace, declaring, “What have you to do with peace? Fall in behind me.” This attitude reflects an unwillingness to engage in any reconciliation, often leading to fragmentation within the faith. For example, within the Church, one group might insist that their mode of worship is the only legitimate one, refusing to cooperate with others. Such rigidity fosters division rather than unity, undermining the broader purpose of the faith.

2. Lukewarm Compromise

On the other hand, excessive compromise seeks to reconcile irreconcilable differences by diluting essential beliefs. This approach, criticised as attempting to “arbitrate between God and humanity,” risks rendering unity meaningless by undermining foundational truths. For example, uniting a group that adheres to core Christian teachings with one that denies them, while ignoring these profound disagreements, would create a superficial and fragile unity. True harmony cannot emerge from neglecting the principles that define faith.

To achieve genuine unity, Bacon suggests, the teachings of Christ offer guidance through two statements: “He who is not with us is against us.” and “He who is not against us is with us.” Although these statements may appear contradictory, they complement each other when properly understood. The first statement warns against those who actively oppose the faith, while the latter advocates embracing those who, despite differences, share essential beliefs. Together, they illustrate the balance required to uphold unity without compromising truth.

To maintain unity, Bacon suggests that fundamental doctrines ought to be distinguished from secondary opinions or practices because disagreements mostly arise over practices rather than core beliefs. For example, one group may favour a particular style of Church music, while another prefers silent prayer. Such differences, being non-essential, should not disrupt unity. Bacon employs the metaphor of the Church’s garment to illustrates this principle: “Christ’s robe had no seam, but the Church’s garment was of many colours.” This implies that while unity is vital, diversity in practice can coexist, provided it does not compromise the faith’s integrity.

Bacon suggests that followers of the religion should avoid disputes. He identifies two types of disputes that threaten unity:

1. Minor Disputes

These involve trivial matters inflated into significant conflicts, such as debates over how to celebrate religious festivals. These disagreements, being unimportant, serve only to divide.

2. Excessive Subtlety (Precision)

This occurs when believers overcomplicate theological issues, engaging in unnecessary arguments over semantics. For instance, two people might dispute whether “God guides through love” or “God shows love through guidance,” despite agreeing in essence. Ultimately, Bacon points, God judges the heart and intention, not the precision of practice. Differences in expression, when rooted in sincere devotion, do not impact unity. This understanding fosters tolerance and mutual respect, allowing the faith community to embrace diversity without compromising its core values.

Thus, Bacon asserts that true unity requires balancing peace and loyalty, avoiding both rigid zeal and careless compromise. By prioritising essential beliefs and respecting diversity in secondary practices, the Church can maintain cohesion while honouring individual expressions of faith.

Next, Bacon focuses on how unity in religion can be achieved without resorting to harmful actions. He argues that true unity must come from mutual understanding and faith, rather than from force or violence. He carefully explains what actions should and should not be taken when addressing differences in religious beliefs. For this, he introduces the concept of two swords among Christians: the spiritual sword and the temporal sword. These swords symbolise two different ways of addressing religious matters:

1. The Spiritual Sword: This refers to using the teachings of religion, like scripture and guidance, to unite people. It emphasises persuasion, dialogue, and peaceful means to resolve disagreements.
2. The Temporal Sword: This represents the authority of governments to maintain order in society. It may be used to deal with extreme cases like public scandal or open rebellion, but only as a last resort and with great caution.

The Holy Spirit (symbol of love and compassion) transformed into a predator (symbol of violence).

Bacon warns against a third sword—the sword of violence and persecution. This refers to using force to spread religion or punish people for their beliefs. For example, he criticises historical events such as the Gunpowder Plot in England, where religion was used as an excuse for violent conspiracies. He calls such actions “monstrous.” So he is particularly against using violence or intimidation to create unity. He argues that this approach harms both religion as well as society. For instance, he mentions how some groups, like the Anabaptists, encouraged rebellion and violence in the name of religion, which the author strongly condemns. Such acts, according to him, bring shame to religion and turn it into a tool for destruction. They make religion appear like a pirate flag symbolising chaos rather than peace. Bacon explains this idea by using a vivid metaphor. He compares the misuse of religion to turning the Holy Spirit, which is meant to be like a gentle dove, into a predator like a vulture or raven. This imagery helps readers understand how forcing unity through violence corrupts the true purpose of religion, which should promote love, harmony and peace.

Bacon believes that religious leaders and scholars have an important role in promoting unity. They must openly condemn acts of violence and oppression committed in the name of religion. By doing so, they can ensure that the teachings of faith remain pure and focused on compassion (संवेदना) and charity (परोपकार). He praises the efforts already made by some leaders to condemn violence. Their efforts show that unity can be achieved through wisdom and compassion rather than force. Bacon also refers to the Apostle’s (disciple of Christ) advice: “The wrath of man does not work the righteousness of God.” This reminds readers that anger and revenge cannot achieve religious or moral goals.

Finally, Bacon warns against hypocrisy in religion. He points out that some people use religious unity as an excuse to serve their personal interests. For example, they may pretend to care about peace while secretly using religion to gain power or control over others. This behaviour is described as a greater blasphemy (disrespect for religion) than the devil’s pride. The “devil’s pride” referred to here is a symbolic expression from Christian theology, where pride is seen as the sin that caused the devil to rebel against God. The devil’s arrogance and refusal to submit to divine authority is often considered the epitome (greatest) of sin. Bacon uses this phrase to highlight the gravity of hypocrisy in religion, suggesting that such actions can be even worse than the devil’s original sin.

When people use religion to serve their personal interests under the guise of promoting unity or peace, they corrupt its true purpose. Religion is meant to uphold values like truth, morality, and the common good. However, by using it as a tool for deception, power, or control, they distort its essence, reducing it to a manipulative force. This act of hypocrisy drags religion down to the level of darkness and deceit because it aligns religion with falsehood and dishonesty, the very traits traditionally associated with evil and the devil. Instead of being a source of light and guidance, religion becomes tainted by selfish and immoral motives.

Thus, Bacon argues that unity in religion must be based on love, understanding, and shared beliefs—not fear or force. Religious leaders and governments should work together to promote peace while avoiding the misuse of authority. Unity should bring people together as humans first, respecting their rights and dignity.

The essay follows a clear and logical structure and carefully leads readers from general ideas about the benefits of unity in religion to practical advice on dealing with divisions in religion. It uses techniques like analogies from common life as well as references from scripture to bring clarity and add moral authority. These techniques made the arguments more convincing, especially for readers familiar with Christian teachings. The essay not only explains the importance of unity in religion but also acknowledges the challenges of achieving it. It offers practical advice, such as distinguishing core beliefs from minor differences and avoiding extreme approaches like blind conformity or unnecessary conflict. This careful balance ensures the argument is thoughtful and fair.

Although the essay is based on Christian teachings, its ideas are relevant to any discussion about building strong, united communities. It emphasises the value of peace, respect for genuine beliefs, and thoughtful handling of disagreements. By combining theory with practical guidance, the essay provides a meaningful and comprehensive discussion of unity in religion.

If you are looking forward to prepare for UGC NET/JRF, you may find this article useful.

Here is a detailed list of topics you need to cover for your NET preparation.

©2024. Md. Rustam Ansari [profrustamansari@gmail.com]